Great three-parter that was published on TwoIceFloes.com, which is managed by Cognitive Dissonance.
The article was written by Morpheus, and makes a valid discussion asking: is the whole geoengineering/chemtrail debate carefully crafted to distract us from realizing that the whole thing is tied to larger wave solar cycles? (If you follow suspicious0bservers or their youtube channel, you’ll find a great video, The Sun is Going to Sleep– worth a watch.)
In any advent, a great case is made for how the big secret is how we are already into the process of quieting solar activity, which means that Earth’s climate would be experiencing some serious changes that involve cooling from above- and below-water volcanic activity along with a weakened Earth magnetic field, leaving the planet vulnerable to electromagnetic bursts from sunspots and coronal mass ejections.
When was the last time you looked up at the daytime sky and really examined it for several minutes? Does it seem different to you in some way, but you just are not sure what it is? Increasingly, people from all walks of life are beginning to realize that at times our skies look quite different from the way they were a few decades ago. While just a few years ago these people would have been laughed out of the room if they expressed their views in public, more and more these days this subject is beginning to be taken seriously by the general public…..and even some ‘officials’ as well.
While some call this phenomenon Geoengineering or Climate Engineering, it is more commonly known in the alternative community as ‘Chemtrails’, where persistent vapor trails (supposedly of water vapor) are visible after a plane passes high overhead. There are many theories offered in the alternative media about what is happening, and we will examine nearly all. However, before we can address any of them we must first ask a more basic question: Why is it so difficult to discover the reasons behind what is going on and why is this observable phenomenon occurring at all? This chapter, the first of three, will describe some of the methods used to intentionally prevent us from knowing and understanding the truth.
Before we can begin to explore the truth we must first understand the various ways we are misled, manipulated and deceived using Psychological Operations or ‘psyops’. Once we are better able to see through the lies and cover stories, then we can begin to explore who and what is behind these programs and what it all means to us. ‘Aerosols’, whether visible or not, will be defined and used throughout these three chapters as the intentional application of materials – chemical, biological, nano or other particles – into the atmosphere most commonly by, but not limited to, airplane. The word ‘chemtrail’, a commonly used descriptive term many are familiar with, has become misleading and even derogatory which in turn helps to perpetuate the manipulation. Therefore it needs to be discarded and will be for the remainder of this series.
Psychological operations (pysops) are the means by which intelligence agencies, governmental operatives and private networks accomplish their deceptions and which operate on every social, corporate and governmental level imaginable. This chapter will examine a number of these psyops, all of which have been deployed against us, and provide examples so we may have the tools to avoid being duped or suckered into their deliberate lies and pursue their false leads.
The basic goal of any psyop is to provide cover for something the operatives wish to remain hidden or obscured. And in the case of aerosols and geoengineering, the psyops appears to be very large and complex since operations of this magnitude require a huge amount of money (many billions of dollars annually), time, cooperation among diverse groups and complicity to make it all happen. Particularly when you consider the number of pilots and air crews, media people, private corporations, governmental agencies and others involved who need to remain silent about it. Given all of these factors there seems to be little question about the importance of what they are covering up, something to keep in mind as we explore this subject further.
The most common and effective psyop used against us is known as ‘Manufactured Consent’ and ‘Manufactured Dissent’. When used together, these techniques are specifically designed to gather consensus for a particular opinion while simultaneously creating controlled, and easily dismissed, dissent by way of a carefully crafted opposing view. These methods are often employed in our political world to polarize an issue by creating false ‘choices’. We are either ‘Left’ or ‘Right’, ‘Conservative’ or ‘Liberal’, ‘Democrat or Republican’.
This also applies to the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) debate where you are presented with only two choices. Either you are required to completely support AGW or you are derisively labeled a climate change denier if you question the so-called ‘settled science’ regardless of whether or not you actually deny changes in the climate. Argue all you want for either side, but you are not allowed to diverge from either, which in turn very effectively constrains both alternative discussions and outcomes.
These command and control techniques have been used for thousands of years to divide and rule the masses via politics, religion, ethnicity, race, gender and so many other ways in order to keep people partitioned and fighting amongst themselves. We might even speculate that Darwin’s theories of evolution were intended to act as Manufactured Dissent to obscure the true cause of evolution while providing a controlled outlet for those looking outside the church for answers to our creation. Given how Darwin’s work buried many truths only now coming to light, along with his connection to British elite and eugenics, and it is not difficult to reach this conclusion, especially when considering the true nature of the evolutionary process.
By forcing people to either side of the aisle in the AGW discussion, this psyops technique severely limits the ongoing conversation regarding the real factors behind climate change while discouraging any mention of aerosols without a verbal beat down consisting of derision, mockery or marginalization and coming from both sides. As you will see in the next chapter, the issue of AGW is inextricably linked to aerosols and it is important and necessary to maintain false beliefs and deception in the climate discussion in order to be useful for other more complicated psyops. Rarely does a psyops exist in a vacuum, but rather many psyops are carefully interlinked to build mutual credibility while more completely confusing the issues from the intermixing. This is done even when one entity does not control the other entity’s psyops. In the black ops world, even opposing forces will feed off each other for their own benefit.
The goal is to keep you endlessly circling this cognitive level and to keep you engaged, consumed and neutered in this ideological fight. For some it has become almost a religion as they try to convert and convince others to act now in order to stop the so-called ‘carbon pollution’ that is supposedly cooking and destroying our planet. And those against AGW are just often as duped, since they are against it for all the wrong reasons yet still serve a useful purpose in the fight. They are just as unwilling to look up and ask ‘why’ and openly discuss what is happening to our skies. Unfortunately both sides are just as quick to dismiss the science in defense of their favored ideology.
If for some reason we find the courage to break from the ideological pack and speak up about the truth, that our climate is influenced by many other factors more significant than human activity and our carefully hidden and obscured solar (and solar system) history is critical to know when trying to understand what is happening today; if this direct approach is tried with such a degree of professionalism that it threatens to be publically influential, then the next level of psyops is quickly deployed to prevent us from effectively speaking out.
Money for silence is often the first (and most effective) approach. But if you don’t remain silent, potentially controlling information or ‘files’ – containing some of the illegal or embarrassing things you may have done or are currently doing – are used against you to force your silence. If that fails or damaging ‘files’ are not available, more direct ‘Soft Weapons’ are used. There are a number of different approaches that can be employed to apply pressure and keep you contained. They can threaten your funding or career, destroy your business and personal relationships, attack you in the media or even physically threaten you. The sky (pun intended) is the limit.
One can look back in time to both Nicola Tesla and Immanuel Velikovsky and recognize how this line of attack was used quite effectively during the course of the last century to keep their important work and theories out of public knowledge and discourse. There are numerous examples of modern day scientists and other professionals suffering severe and debilitating consequences when they spoke out against, or directly questioned, the AGW ideology. And all it takes is a few public beatings to dissuade others from openly considering other factors when researching or discussing climatic change.
Most people remain at this level in the ideological fight without ever seriously considering what is happening both in our skies and further out in space. Is it no wonder then that people remain functionally unaware of the persistent trails and aerosol programs since they have been manipulated into not questioning it? Many might not remember, but a decade ago questions about persistent trails were widely covered in the media and it was openly discussed at the time. The term used back then was also ‘chemtrails’ and in order to deflect and dampen the public discourse the word was quickly associated with the CIA-developed derogatory term ‘Conspiracy Theorist’.
With that weapon in their arsenal, the operatives could provide a simple but illogical explanation for the persistent trails and quickly dismiss serious people armed with valid questions by the effective use of public derision. Most people quickly moved back into their slumber and did not question the issue further, especially since they did not want to be associated with all those other publically disliked Conspiracy Theorists. A similar method was used early on to dispel ‘Truther’ questions about 9/11. It was, and remains, a very negatively charged weapon that can be quickly mobilized to shut down discussion on any controversial subject.
However, there are those of us who realize something is going on that is not normal, especially since the persistent trails have increased in frequency over the last decade, thereby prompting many more people to ask penetrating questions, do their own research and begin to break away from the hive mind of consensus and corralled thinking.
At this point, newer and increasingly complex psyops are required as it becomes progressively more difficult to keep a lid on it by keeping us confused and contained. As we begin to follow the camouflaged trail and look to non-mainstream sources for information and analysis, we find sock puppets who are paid trolls, opposition figures and various others in chat rooms and forums. An entire industry of professional trolls has been created just to convince you, me and millions like us that it is crazy and socially dangerous to look any further.
Many of our friends and family, who often lack the natural curiosity and intestinal fortitude to swim against the tide and be shunned themselves, prefer to think we are nuts to even discuss subjects such as this. Complicating matters immensely, we have probably brought our own AGW opinion or ideology to the party and have yet to find other resources that could educate us about our climate in relation to the space beyond our atmosphere, our own sun and other celestial bodies. With all this, most mildly curious people just throw up their hands in frustration and head back to their mind numbing entertainment for emotional relief.
The lack of understanding of the AGW psyops (or any psyop for that matter) provides an opportunity for more nuanced operatives called ‘Gate Keepers’ to engineer their blocking techniques. These highly trained specialists provide kernels of credible information and readily admit to part of the truth, thereby providing plausible cover for the larger hidden issues. The gate keepers are widely supported by the subverted mainstream media and are declared public experts, thereby appearing highly credible in the eye of the general public. This valuable media support enables them to bar the gates to embargoed information and a better understanding of the subject matter. Often the information provided by the gate keeper is designed to distract and disarm or, in this case, to feed the overall ideology of AGW no matter what side you may still support.
We can think of a few groups that fit this description, for example Geoengineering Watch to name just one. They are popular in some of the alternative media and are involved in the production of documentaries that perpetuate the AGW myth, yet they refuse to engage in serious discussion about the role our sun plays in our planet’s climate. Ultimately they are similar in function and style to Noam Chomsky, Glenn Greenwald and Amy Goodman, all well-known 9/11 (and other verboten subjects) gate keepers.
Now that geoengineering itself is becoming more familiar to the public, in the latest psyops twist we now find much talk about using geoengineering to combat the Global Warming threat, effectively using leverage on one subject to perpetuate another in what is called a ‘Limited Hangout’. This ‘theme’ has become more prominent in the alternative media over the last few years, with questionable sources like Abby Martin of Russia Today or even Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! playing their well rehearsed role to help roll it all out for public consumption. I will speak more on this subject in the next chapter.
Another twist to be aware of is Nexrad, a term often used to describe land-based electromagnetic facilities used together with aerosols to manufacture all of our weather. We are informed it is used solely for this purpose; sometimes it is even promoted as weather warfare. However, there is no discussion of space weather impacts when discussing Nexrad and solar influences are never mentioned by those acting as a Gatekeeper for this issue.
As mentioned earlier, limited hangouts are another attractive nuisance designed to keep you from the truth. We can identify when a limited hangout is deployed by recognizing certain revealing characteristics identified by Webster G. Tarpley, who had originally developed the list during his study of geopolitical events. Some of the same giveaways can also be applied to identify other types of limited hangout psyops on topics such as aerosols.
The list is as follows.
1. Media Darling — you are the spotlight of the media
2. Nothing New — you learn nothing new from what they reveal
3. Nothing Big — they don’t address larger connected issues; for example 9/11, false flag attacks, financial fraud etc
4. Prepares New Coverts Ops –- it acts as cover for larger operations
5. Cheerleaders Get Prestigious Careers — back to Chomsky, Goodman and Greenwald
6. No Top Careers Destroyed — damaging information that is attributed to, or blamed upon, no one of importance
7. Damascus Road Conversion — now s/he believes the ‘truth’ should be revealed
A subject that quickly comes to mind when looking at this list is HAARP. With books, TV shows and other significant media coverage focused squarely upon HARRP, one has to wonder why so much can be known about a ‘secret’ program that gets so much of the blame for aerosols, weather modification and other related programs. It was handed to you and me on a beautifully engraved silver platter as the solution to all our questions. All one need do is consume and then sleep.
Another debilitating technique used is to create or enflame infighting within the ‘community’ to induce you and I to choose the ‘right’ side by accepting their argument for why they alone are correct. We saw this recently with Dane Wigington and Michael Murphy attacking each other while WeatherWar101 skillfully inserted him/herself into the fight. With explosive terms bandied about by both sides such as disinformation, agent/operative and psyops, it is easy to fall prey to these false ‘disagreements’. While they claim to occupy different sides of the discussion, all of them refuse to talk about the main influences on our climate and weather systems, even going so far as to deny it is relevant at all.
To fully understand the changes to our climate we must know our true solar history (something which has been deliberately kept from us) what is presently happening within our solar system and, perhaps more important, with our sun. If we fail to do so we will remain deeply confused, which leads directly to false trails down dead end rabbit holes. In chapter three you will find trusted information sources that can help you acquire this knowledge.
There are a number of theories that purport to explain the geoengineering and aerosol programs, some of which are likely organic while others are intentionally developed and planted to keep us confused and away from the truth. Regardless, each of them needs to be considered in light of all of the facts we have and viewed through the revealing lens of psyops. Remember, what is not talked about is often far more important than what is actually discussed. While some theories may be true or even part of larger operations or programs, others can be easily disproven as false, uninformed or intentional disinformation.
In chapter two we will examine some of these theories and poke holes in them where appropriate. In addition, we need to further explore the use and abuse of the word ‘Chemtrails’, a very broad and indistinct term commonly used to describe all we observe visually and chemically. It may be vitally important to publically abandon the use of this word and use persistent aerosols and non-persistent aerosols instead. The distinction is relevant and will be parsed further in chapter two.
Before an analysis can be done of the most common explanations given for the aerosol program, we must first look at the various explanations through the clarifying lens of Psychological Operations (psyops) to circumvent deliberate attempts to mislead and deceive us as previously described in Chapter One. The background found there will assist us in this second installment as we examine each rationale presented to us by both the mainstream and alternative media. As stated in the previous chapter, some of the reasons and justifications offered are intentional disinformation while others are simply speculation based solely upon limited and unconnected information, quite often promoted by sincere individuals just trying to learn ‘the truth’.
What are missing from most analyses of this subject are two things – the issue of intent and the muddling of facts. As more and more people delve into the aerosol issue, they can clearly see something is happening over their heads. And they are beginning to realize what they see in the sky is not normal, with persistent aerosols formed into grid patterns or aerosol lines which slowly disperse to turn the entire visible sky a milky white. There are other strange anomalies all adding up to one thing, visual evidence that can be captured on (digital) film making it difficult to dispute. Unfortunately this phenomenon is often described using the psyops captured and subverted term ‘chemtrails’ by those who are waking up to the issue. This is precisely why the terms ‘persistent trails’ or ‘persistent aerosol trails’ are used throughout this series of three essays.
Another observation we can document is the increased levels of aluminum, barium and various other metals in our soils and our bodies. Aluminum seems to be one of the more commonly referred to metals and presents as one which is consistently much higher than ‘normal’. These elements are also identified as ‘chemtrails’ which emanate from the persistent aerosols that are visually observed. But by using the same co-opted word to describe two different findings, it is implied they are created and spread at the same time by the same people with the same intent.
Once we separate them from each other and use better terminology to describe them, we can more easily recognize that many of the explanations given don’t accurately reflect reality and we can discard those that do not work. This helps us to better understand the true goals of this program or set of programs……or at the very least, to recognize what they are not. Sometimes it helps just to eliminate some of the mental clutter.
The issue of intentionality is critically important in this analysis. Given this is a global program conducted at the highest levels of many different sovereign governments, including their militaries, private networks and contractors involving significant sums of money to operate, one thing appears certain; they don’t do random. Meaning if the goal is to apply nano-metals into the troposphere, stratosphere, or other levels of our atmosphere, persistent trails are not necessary. Therefore it is reasonable to postulate that the persistent aerosols are being applied for a very specific reason, with the subsequent understanding this is where the program has its most significant public exposure since it is so visually obvious.
There clearly exists a need and a reason for the persistent trails to behave in this manner. If the goal was to apply only nano-metals, this could easily be done with non-persistent aerosols. The nano-metals could be mixed into the jet fuel used by passenger and military aircraft and expelled during normal flight operations. Or they could be directly applied to the atmosphere via aircraft spray systems or other applicators at higher altitudes which are not visible from the ground. Clearly the persistent aerosols are either a unique program or are at the very least intended for different needs with different outcomes.
With this initial analysis providing a deeper and more nuanced understanding of several contributing factors, we can now begin to examine each of the major explanations we are presented with and see if any of them fit as a primary reason for these aerosol operations, thus worthy of the scope, size and psychological operations marshaled for these programs. They are outlined below.
1) The perpetrators are trying to kill or poison us
The simple fact is ‘they’ possess much more effective ways to slowly kill us and at a much lower cost, so why would they do it this way? However, it would not be surprising to learn they were willing to sacrifice people getting sick (and dying) from higher levels of Aluminum as an unintended, but necessary, consequence of the unavoidable fallout.
The so-called healthcare industry operates more like a ‘sickcare’ industry which profits from its ‘customers’ and is more than willing to harvest even more income from increasingly sicker people. Alzheimer’s has been on the rise over the last few decades and it is a very costly illness to ‘treat’ given the amount of specialized (and expensive) care stricken individuals require. These sociopathic perpetrators and their profiteering enablers would not miss out on an opportunity to benefit significantly from people becoming sick(er).
This is not to say that toxins or poisons are not, or never have been, added to the aerosols. The US has a long history of testing harmful biological, chemical and radioactive materials on U.S. citizens, and many other people around the globe, without their knowledge or consent. Those suffering from Morgellons disease are likely the result of some type of toxic material inserted into the aerosols at some point. However, if they really wanted to kill or poison us they are doing a really poor job. If the goal was just to make us sick, persistent trails are inefficient and ultimately unnecessary.
2) Taking over the food supply
There are some who speculate these programs are being executed for, or in collusion with, Monsanto. Since the aluminum in the soil is increasing and Monsanto now has a Genetic Engineering (GE) aluminum resistant seed, there is a belief these programs are intended to benefit their takeover of the food supply. More likely though Monsanto was informed, either during or after the program was conceived, that there would be an increase in metal concentrations due to the unavoidable fallout and were directed to develop a GE crop for this type of problem. Persistent trails again are unnecessary.
3) Mind Control/Entrainment
This explanation may be valid as a side benefit, but persistent trails has been going on for a long time and doesn’t seem to be needed since propaganda, pharmaceuticals, fluoride, and various I-things (to name just a few) are sufficient to further the zombification of the masses. Persistent trails are also unnecessary in this case.
4) Military Applications
There are many stated military uses already made public for certain types of aerosols. For example, Operation Popeye was a highly classified weather modification program during the Vietnam War in Southeast Asia (1967-1972). Others, such as chaff, are dispersed in the atmosphere as a radar countermeasure. While these types of applications exist and are now well-documented, their existence by itself does not sufficiently explain the reason for a massive global program combined with a coordinated effort to mislead and misinform the populace.
5) Weather Modification
Contrary to popular belief weather modification is not a myth and does appear to be one aspect of the operation, especially with the persistent aerosol trails. But more likely it is not the primary reason for these programs. There are many forms of weather modification, from applications in warfare going back decades and now openly admitted, to current efforts intended to address issues such as persistent regional drought. The use of silver iodide was even reported recently on my local evening news to describe cloud seeding efforts designed to generate increased rainfall from existing clouds.
There are some in the alternative community pushing the idea this is being done solely for profit. While there are certainly those who will profit from this opportunity, and weather derivatives may be an easy mark for those profiteers, it is not reasonable to explain this as the primary motive behind these programs, especially when it is so much easier to be handed billions of dollars by the central banks and their crony capitalists as we have seen repeatedly done over the last decade.
It may be that some of the persistent trails are in fact used for weather modification programs. There appears to be more frequent persistent trails in advance of, and around, developing weather systems. These trails seem to be intentional since they are seen via satellite images and could be used as targeting gaps or anomalies in other lines, hence many of the grid patterns shown in photos over the past decade. It would also seem logical and possible they could also be used for mapping the multi-layered and evolving wind and weather patters that can be seen on global wind maps.
The persistent trail lines would provide much more detail and localized information about what is happening within the different atmospheric layers, allowing them the opportunity to better influence existing weather systems. It is much easier to modify weather than it is to create it from scratch. However, observed persistent trails behave in many different ways, not just grid patterns. This would imply different purposes – more on this line of thought in Chapter Three.
6) Weather Creation
We also need to distinguish between modification and creation. The Kardashev scale of technological advancement states, “a Type I civilization has achieved mastery of the resources of its home planet, Type II of its solar system.” While it is unlikely the group or groups running these programs have achieved Type II status, Type I is easily a possibility. But even if they have reached Type I status, it does not automatically imply doing so would include the ability to create and control weather. The earth’s climate and weather systems are extremely complex and difficult to model, let alone control. The energy coming in from space and our sun exerts far more of an impact upon our weather than anyone in ‘authority’ is willing to admit to or even seriously discuss.
Some popular websites and discussion forums promote the belief all of our weather is manufactured and the sole reason for the persistent aerosols. While the U.S. Air Force did have a stated goal of owning the weather by 2025, this does not mean the ability to create the weather like storms and droughts where and when it is desired. Ownership or control does not imply creation.
7) Global Warming Mitigation
Solar Radiation Management (SRM) is something which is openly discussed, with information about its various aspects easily found whether it be from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), patent searches, university research or ‘news’ covered in puff pieces by the mainstream ‘alternative’ media like “Democracy Now!” or “Breaking the Set”. SRM has often been referred to as Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering (SAG) and now Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI). The key here is to distinguish the difference between stratosphere and troposphere.
Many of the patents for SRM, as well as what is being publically discussed and proposed, is about applying metals and nano-metals high in the stratosphere to reflect the sun’s light back into space to mitigate Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW). Commercial airplanes and those currently applying persistent aerosols are mainly flying in the troposphere or at the very bottom of the stratosphere. What is being offered to us as a solution to AGW is conflicted and false from the very start, relying upon the assumption you would not know the difference between them.
All the SRM parties identify with, and admit to, global spraying as a potential option to address the threat of global warming with the theory that certain particles sprayed into the stratosphere would help block the sun from cooking our planet due to our carbon emissions. However, according to the ‘experts’, it is only being ‘tested’ in limited cases and would be deployed only if deemed necessary.
Considering how this public ‘meme’ is being slowly rolled out alongside the global warming agenda, we should not be surprised when groups start demanding this spraying activity be started to save us from planetary destruction. Let us not fall for this bait, but instead see Solar Radiation Management for what it is, a limited hangout psyop in which spraying is acknowledged and claimed to be needed. We need to see the AGW psyops for what it is so these false programs cannot be used as an opportunity to publicly explain and justify what is already happening in our skies.
Now that we have examined each of the theories above and have recognized their weaknesses, which prevent them from being the primary reason for the aerosol programs, thereby invalidating any of them from explaining as a primary cause what is going on in our sky, we can move on to Chapter Three where we will offer several alternative theories for the programs. While these theories may not be the only answer, or even the correct one, they are the only ones that can withstand scrutiny above all others.
This third and final chapter specifically uses the word ‘theories’ because they are just that, since we have yet to see any credible and definitive ‘official’ explanations for what is happening in our skies. But before getting to the theories I have developed, some items of interest need to be shared so you may better understand what I have discovered and how it led me to these conclusions.
The links in the previous two chapters reveal some of the resources that helped guide me in my exploration of this issue, while the resources below will hopefully connect it all together for you just as it did for me. As I mentioned in Chapter One and Chapter Two, there are other important pieces to this puzzle that are rarely discussed. And during those infrequent occasions when they are covered, it is usually poorly done. I am speaking of the hidden and carefully obscured history of our solar system and how it relates to what is presently happening in our solar system, and more specifically, with our Earth and Sun.
There are some puzzle pieces that interconnect more than others, while a few serve as a hub of sorts where many intersect with one in the same manner select subway stations join many separate lines together in one place to facilitate transfers. When we take the time to closely examine one of the pieces, we often find it is connected to one or more additional puzzles via their pieces.
As I articulated in the last two chapters, there is great effort and expense expended to keep the truth hidden. And a big component of that truth is Outer Space, which I believe is one of those hubs. It connects together so many of the other puzzles including the Secret Space Program, ET, black budgets, aerosols, catastrophes, climate change and so much more.
I didn’t realize how important Space was to everything else until I stumbled across Suspicious 0bservers and the volumes of quite often unique research found there. The work, research, videos and information on their website helped show me how much of it is all connected and, more importantly, why. Not only was I beginning to understand why the weather behaves the way it does, but also why earthquakes, volcanoes, auroras and so much more did so as well. I also began to understand why those ‘In Charge’ or ’The Powers that Shouldn’t Be’ or the ‘Breakaway Civilization’ – there are so many obscuring names – were behaving in the manner they were.
The answers I unearthed and the pieces I connected are one of the reasons why this chapter was so difficult, but important, to write. If the startling truth were officially acknowledged, the general public would most likely react in a very negative way. In fact I strongly suspect most would be unwilling to accept it as ‘truth’ simply because it is so contrary to what ‘normal’ is perceived to be. Others might even participate in mass panic and riots, either out of great fear or because they are righteously indignant they had been so thoroughly deceived all their lives. However the truth, as difficult as it may be, does need to be told so those who are ready to accept it can better understand what is happening in order to prepare themselves mentally, physically, emotionally and spiritually for what is coming our way.
Our solar history involves so much more than we have been taught and led to believe. It is far more complicated and catastrophic than is publicly discussed or even admitted. We as the human species have endured and survived many significant events over the last dozen millennia which have impacted and changed our planet in ways many cannot truly comprehend even after learning about it. Real history, not the politicized and manipulated history we are taught as children and propagandized with as adults, indicates many of these changes occur during different cycles, each with their own unique climatic, weather, atmospheric and other life changing effects.
One of those historically better known climatic changes was during a cycle that occurs relatively frequently, and most recently in the 1600’s. It is called the Solar Grand Minimum and it returns roughly every 360-400 years. The last one was called the Maunder Minimum, crediting the name to a pair of scientists of that era who were observing and counting sun spots. They noticed the sun spot count dropped significantly and varied greatly from the ‘normal’ counts during the previously observed solar cycles.
These regular lulls in both solar output and activity are closely correlated with global cooling. During the Maunder Minimum, our planet experienced something now described as the Little Ice Age where some 25% of the population died, many due to starvation from massive crop failures. And this was when most people grew the vast majority of their own food. Imagine what would happen today if those same weather changes and temperature drops occurred.
While a solar sunspot shutdown is certainly worrisome, considering the expected specific types of dramatic impacts to humans, the opposite of reduced solar activity – a large solar proton event which could develop as a solar flare or eruption – could impact us and the rest of planet in very dramatic and sudden ways as has been demonstrated and documented in the recent past. As recently as 2003, the “Halloween Solar Storm” had a major impact on satellites, communications equipment and some limited power failures. In 1989, a large solar flare caused a complete grid failure in Quebec and some parts of the northeast U.S.
While the more recent solar flare was larger, it was not Earth facing and therefore had less impact. However, in 1859 we experienced the ‘Carrington Event’ which was a massive earth facing solar flare that caused the telegraphs to catch fire due to the induced electrical surge. For it to generate auroras so quickly, brilliantly and far reaching, and to cause so much damage, meant it was an unprecedented event in modern times. Most people cannot begin to comprehend the impact to our culture of something similar if it were to happen today in the age of electronics everywhere and ‘just-in-time’ delivery of most goods and services. There would be massive supply disruptions and unimaginable consequences, likely ending the lives of countless millions of people on this planet.
While the frequency of these types of large solar flares is sporadic, our complacency and reliance upon modern technology means smaller solar events can have a much larger impact than if they had occurred just 50 years ago. And this does not even factor in a weakened planetary magnetosphere which will be discussed next. The March 1989 solar storm also informs us about the potential impact due to a weakened magnetosphere. Three and half days prior to that blackout, on March 13, 1989, there was a solar flare. But it was not a very big one (relatively speaking) since it was only an M-Class with much less ejected material than an X-Class would produce. However, just days before this flare, there was an X15 which tied for number 5 of the strongest flares of the last 30 years. The larger solar flare had a significant impact on the magnetosphere, weakening it so much that the smaller and weaker one a few days later took out parts of the power grid.
In addition to the grand minimum cycle, there is also a much longer and more significant cycle that repeats roughly every 11,500 to 12,000 years. Evidence shows a number of significant events occur with regular frequency in this cycle. One event which is extremely important and may actually influence, or be the cause of other global events, is a magnetic pole excursion or a complete reversal of Earth’s magnetic field. This is where the north and south magnetic poles wander around for hundreds, even thousands of miles. Worse than that, they can undergo a complete geomagnetic reversal so your compass now points to magnetic south instead of north. The impact on our GPS, air travel and mapping systems alone would be a huge problem. But even these issues would likely be the least of our worries.
The earth is essentially a large sphere magnet with north polarity towards the North Pole and south to the South Pole, with both connected by magnetic field lines that extend above the planet in layers. The Earth’s magnetic field is basically an electromagnetic shield that protects us from charged, high-energy particles coming from solar events or Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) from cosmic events in our galaxy or others nearby.
When our magnetic shields are functioning well, they absorb and deflect these charged particles, though some may enter through the Polar Regions where the magnetic field is smaller and weaker. When this occurs, and especially when accompanied with solar discharges, auroras can generally be seen in the far north and south. However, when solar discharges are larger or our magnetic fields are weaker, either due to a recent solar proton event or from other causes, the auroras extend further towards the equator as they did during the Carrington Event.
Not only do charged solar particles get through to the surface of our planet when our magnetic fields are weaker, but Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCR) do so as well, bombarding and impacting the planet and its inhabitants in many diverse ways. The GCR’s are essentially various types of ionized radiation which can cause obvious effects such as mutations and cancers. Another effect is increased cloud formation and nucleation when the rays ionize the atmosphere and water droplets condense on the resulting ions and aerosol particles.
This increase in cloud cover and atmospheric moisture can impact both short-term weather and the longer term climate. Finally, GCRs can cause reductions in atmospheric ozone which is another type of atmospheric protection from solar radiation. Increases in various types of radiation correlates well with the timing of cyclical magnetic excursions and reversals, but the more concerning correlations are the extinctions and emergences of new species during and after these events. Robert Felix documents this well in both of his books.
Another major Earth event that occurs with similar timing is the increase in volcanic activity, both in number and in strength. The two locations where these volcanic eruptions occur, terranean and undersea, each have their own compounding implications upon the climate when they erupt. The massive release of particulates into the air from terranean eruptions causes a cooling effect from the release of volcanic ash. The ash blocks light and radiant heat from the sun while the release of Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) has other atmospheric cooling affects. Thankfully, most of the terranean volcanoes have been well-mapped and their activity documented, especially in the last century.
The less obvious and mostly unknown volcanoes are massive underwater monsters which, when they erupt, can impact ocean temperatures, melt glaciers (or at least a part of them) like the West Antarctica ice sheet, and increase the amount of atmospheric moisture generated when the hot lava meets the ocean during an eruption. This additional water vapor mixes with vapor already in the atmosphere, which in turn causes even more cloud cover. The net effect is reduced sunlight as well as more rain and snow that accumulate as more and deeper layers of ice on glaciers.
While this chapter on aerosol theories stops at this cycle, there are several equally important cycles that warrant further exploration and investigation. They are known as the Milankovitch cycles: the 23,000-year equinox cycle and the 100,000-year eccentricity period. The precession of the equinox itself has many historical connections and references; however the theory that we may be part of a binary star system may have more direct relevance on the cyclical magnetic excursions and reversals.
The 100,000 year cycle advises us that for most of the time this planet is in an ice age, with some periods colder than others. Our present civilization has been fortunate to blossom during a warmer interglacial period over the last 10,000+ years. If (advanced) civilizations lived prior to this time, during the longer ice age as some researchers have posited, they would likely have survived and thrived by living closer to the equatorial regions.
Many of the known ancient human habitation sites encircle our planet in a relatively straight line which, strangely enough, does not follow or parallel the current equator. ‘Why’ immediately springs to mind and is an important question relevant to our history, but likely not a direct factor in the aerosol programs. If Velikovsky and the researchers at the Thunderbolts Project are correct regarding what has taken place in our solar system over the last 5,000 or more years, it completely changes what we thought we knew about the development of the major religions, the growth and spread of civilization and the context and significance of many historical texts and beliefs. It may even answer the ‘why’ question above.
While each of these solar events are worthy of their own chapter, or in some cases an entire book, I wanted to provide some context to our solar history and what it might mean to us if past (mostly hidden) events were to happen again. As I was working on this chapter, over several days a massive sunspot group moved across the face of the sun to face our planet. These sunspots generated a number of solar flares, the most we have seen in a while, and the largest sunspot grouping in 25 years.
During this sunspot activity the potential for a large, Earth-directed solar eruption was very real given the sunspot was ten times the size of our planet and contained a vigorous mixing of both negative and positive charges that creates the ideal conditions for significant flaring. Funny then how the ‘New Scientist’ issue of October 28th asked “Does it pose dangers to us?” when the sunspots were already departing and no longer a real threat. Where was the ‘New Scientist’ the week before, when the grouping came around from the back side and the potential of significant danger was real and immediate?
While large solar flares do pose a real and present danger to our current way of life, there are steps people and institutions can take to protect themselves, the power grid and other important infrastructure. As with other unpredictable (but known and understood) natural disasters, being prepared is critical to survival. Solar flaring is something to be personally concerned about, and if you pay just a little attention on a daily basis you might get a 24-hour warning of impending danger. However, while factoring this into your planning process, another more long-term but predictable consideration should not be overlooked. It is the lack of sunspot flaring and activity we are presently experiencing, and the various causal effects of this event, which should be understood and appreciated.
The pattern of the current solar sunspot cycle is following those which occurred in the early 1600s. The path so far, and the future trend for the present solar maximum (the solar cycle is an eleven year maximum alternated by an eleven year minimum) is reduced flaring by a significant degree compared to prior solar maximums. This reduced solar activity corresponds well with the historical Solar Grand Minimum cycle. The reduced solar energy also causes major disruptions to the Earth’s jet stream, creating conditions conducive to more climate extremes exactly as we are experiencing today. Because we now recognize this strong correlation, it might make sense to study weather patterns during the 1600s to see what might be expected both with near term weather conditions and long-term climate change during this century.
However, during the last Grand (Maunder) Minimum civilization was not also facing a magnetosphere that was declining in strength at an ever increasing rate. The scientific community has documented a 10% decline over the last 150 years and 5% more in the last 10 years, which indicates a clear acceleration in decline. Additionally, the magnetic poles are wandering in ‘location’ at an increasing rate as well. While a true and complete magnetic reversal is a distinct possibility, small as it may be, a substantial geomagnetic excursion is far more probable and problematic. Based upon recent historical record it appears certain there are dramatic magnetic shifts taking place today that should alert us to additional and escalating Earth changes just around the corner.
The above discussed Earth changes trigger or augment other effects which we can easily identify and observe if we understand what it is we are looking at. Global volcanic activity has been steadily increasing, and we can expect it to intensify in strength and frequency as the magnetosphere continues to decline. This alone could have a dramatic cooling impact on our weather. For example, Iceland’s Bárðarbunga, a volcano presently erupting, can emit volumes of SO2 equal to twice what all of Europe emits each day. As mentioned earlier, the addition of moisture from under water eruptions only amplifies the impact of cooler temperatures with more snow and ice as a result.
As is well documented, there is an increase in Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCR) corresponding to the decline in our magnetosphere. Unfortunately it is difficult to predict exactly how much GCR’s will increase in concert with a decreasing magnetosphere, on what timescale and with what overall Earth impact. We do know more radiation will be filtering through and while there may not be immediate measurable effects from it, the long-term consequences would be devastating. We do know there will be further clouding and precipitation, which acts to compound any impact from a Solar Grand Minimum or volcanic activity.
Another important effect mentioned earlier is a significant reduction of atmospheric ozone. As we have been taught and repeatedly told, the reason for the decline in the ozone layer, or the creation of ozone holes, was due to the release of Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and other substances that deplete the level of ozone. The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, which entered into force in 1989, was developed to address and correct this problem. The hole continued to grow, reaching its maximum in the year 2000 and with the current size only 10% below this level. One would think after more than 25 years of CFC reductions agreed to in the treaty, there would eventually be continuous and substantial reductions in the size of the ozone hole.
If it isn’t shrinking, there must be other influences impacting ozone depletion. How much do those other unnamed factors influence the decline? Asking that one question quickly brings a whole host of others to mind. Why weren’t those ‘other’ factors ever mentioned when discussing the agreed upon global protocol? Was this treaty, created to fix a ‘man-made’ problem that may actually have other causes such as space weather, just a warm-up for a larger global warming psyops to divert attention and money elsewhere?
It certainly calls into question whether it ever was a human caused problem to begin with and if the proclaimed ‘solution’ really is working because recent measurements present a different picture. If humans aren’t the cause, or the solution is patently false, then other solutions were surreptitiously deployed or a ‘fix’ naturally occurred. I would discard the latter given all of the other space factors occurring. Also, the timing of the ozone decline, stabilization and slight improvement are interestingly correlated with the deployment in the 1990’s, and the observed increase in the 2000’s, of the persistent aerosol programs.
One other factor should be mentioned before getting to the aerosol theories I promised several pages ago. Not only is our sun going through all the major changes previously described, but dramatic change is occurring within our entire solar system affecting many of the other planets. On Venus, the fastest winds have increased by 33% and its rotation has slowed by a day. Mars and other planets have been warming up during the time Earth was warming. The big spot on Jupiter has been fading while Red Junior was born and an entire planetary stripe of clouds disappeared.
Saturn’s regular 30-year super storm arrived 10 years early, was much bigger, and lasted many times longer than was previously recorded. This would be similar to a storm bigger than Katrina striking the southeast U.S. and lasting for months. Saturn’s rotational speed has also been changing. You can find many other examples of changes in our solar system, and not just on our sun. Given this, should we not also expect to see major changes here on planet Earth as well? Are aerosols being used to mitigate some of the impact from these global (and solar system) changes? I think a case could be made that both persistent and non-persistent trails are being applied as mitigation techniques.
As was discussed in chapter two, weather modification and manipulation is a capability and a reality. The only question that remains is to what degree is this capacity. It would certainly be no surprise to me if a fierce storm such as Sandy or a hurricane similar to Katrina were manipulated and altered, either to strengthen or weaken it and for political or geostrategic purpose. It should be acknowledged that the U.S. has not suffered many major storms compared to the rest of the world, particularly of late the Asian Pacific.
Additionally, considering the narcissistic arrogance and sociopathic tendencies of present day ‘leadership’, we would expect the weaponization of these technologies to be applied in warfare as well as in covert operations against our so-called enemies. And as is increasingly evident these days, they would also be used against our friends as well as here at home. However, the ability to influence is not the same as the ability to create. It has been observed and documented that solar activity precedes both storm and earthquake activity, which in turn easily defuses the argument that most extreme weather is man-made and that HAARP causes the earthquakes.
However, it would not be difficult to posit that the capability exists whereby the effects of these solar events can be influenced or leveraged to occur in a specific location. Or at the very least, to posses the advance knowledge of where these solar influences will strike. Persistent aerosols have been documented to be deployed in several types of military applications, whether it be cloud seeding or chaffing. Often seen are trails that intersect others and target anomalies in other trails. This could be used for the mapping of the atmospheric layers and how they are behaving so that man-made and directed energy such as Ultra Low Frequency (ULF), electrical or geomagnetic can be applied to pull, push, diminish or enhance a weather system.
While the persistent trails mentioned above behave very specifically and can be observed in advance of, or nearby, storm systems, another type of persistent trail can often be seen in use. Recall from Chapter Two that persistent trails are intentional and could be deployed in different programs with multiple purposes. The other type of common trail observed forms a milky-white haze which may be used to block some of the energy from the sun or to create an artificial cloud cover.
Is this diffused aerosol trail able to block some aspects of the harmful radiation due to the ozone loss, or is it actually able to replace a portion of the lost ozone in the atmosphere? One thing I have noticed, along with everyone else I have asked, is that the sun’s intensity is hotter and more severe than it was when we were younger. Whether it is a cold day or hot, the sun feels hotter; this seems to correlate well with the steady increase in skin cancers. The increase in solar intensity may be directly related to the depletion of the ozone, something to do with the magnetosphere decline, or something related to our solar system shift. Whatever the cause, this is one area that is changing, is easily observed and certainly warrants further investigation.
Increased radiation is not only something which is possible, but rather should be expected. Spraying nano particles of aluminum and other reactive metals could be one way of deflecting or stopping some of the incoming radiation. The official explanations given for the patents and materials being applied in our skies are supposedly for Solar Radiation Management (SRM), but which might be more aptly named Cosmic Radiation Management. While the former may be technically accurate, the larger and more concerning issue is the latter. If galactic radiation is one of the reasons aerosols and public deception are needed, then we can understand why they believe they cannot be open and honest about these programs.
There is another aspect to aerosols that should be considered, but I have yet to find anyone who could address the question. Could the application of nano metals or other materials also serve to help (re)charge our magnetosphere? If this were possible, then it could delay when, and possibly if, a magnetic pole reversal or excursion takes place. It could also explain why our planet is not undergoing changes of the same magnitude other planets in our solar system are experiencing. If charging the magnetosphere is a capability, then the scope of it is likely limited and only slowing the process, since observations indicate it continues to decline and has been doing so at an increasing rate over the last few decades. Either these metals are exclusively addressing the radiation or they are having an impact on our magnetosphere which at best is temporary in nature.
There could easily be other reasons behind the aerosol programs and my theories may not be correct in part or in total. However, in their defense not only do my theories adequately explain the reasons behind both persistent and non-persistent aerosols better than others, but they also present realistic scenarios in which one would expect these types of actions to be taken given the actual threats we face as inhabitants of planet Earth. I hope others will take up this research and pursue it further with the benefit of this new perspective so they can avoid wasted years of manipulation, misinformation and misdirection.
These three essays were not intended to argue the issue of man-made global warming (AGW) and this author accepts it for the psyops it is. A question was recently asked of me: “If there is no AGW, and CO2 really doesn’t influence the climate as much as is claimed, what is the geopolitical purpose behind it?” It is a complicated question and likely the confluence of many factors. If the climate is certain to change and some of the negative impacts can only be mitigated (and then only temporarily) it is much easier to keep people fighting each other over who and/or what is to blame rather than providing solutions that might not exist for everyone on the planet when their ultimate survival may not actually be desired.
One thing does appear to be certain. Solar Radiation Management is being endorsed and supported by many media, academic and governmental institutions as a means to address the warming of our plant. Without man-made global warming as the patsy so to speak, the arguments for SRM and those behind it completely falls apart along with the credibility of some who claim to be ‘chemtrail’ activists. Essentially it is in the best interest of many involved parties on both ‘sides’ to keep the cover story in place. However, the complete opposite of global warming appears to be developing, with the scale and timing to be the pertinent questions and something we need to explore further so we can be better prepared in the years to come.
Interestingly, it was widely known back in the 70’s we were likely facing an ice age. The question we should ask of those in power is glaringly obvious and frighteningly simple: what did ‘they’ learn to cause them to stop telling the truth and for us to stop asking questions? There are some who speculate that President Jimmy Carter wept after a briefing about UFO’s due to its threat, or that religion would be made irrelevant from the disclosure. Instead he might have been told about our solar history, why it is important to our survival, and what humanity, including his grandchildren, may face in the not-to-distant future.
I wish to state emphatically that I am against what is being done to our skies and especially the secrecy behind it. I may not know of all the threats facing humanity, but I do believe some of what I have laid out is what deeply frightens those who portend to rule. Many of the covert mitigation programs and preparations already implemented, whether they are in the atmosphere, outer space or underground, can be explained by the Earth changes and disruptions we appear to be facing. Knowing some of what ‘they’ have learned, what they have already done and are presently doing and, more importantly, what they have not revealed, tells me they are not only fearful of public disclosure, but are acting in a selfish and irresponsible manner. To me, this fact is more disturbing than the unavoidable changes and future challenges we face.
Humanity has survived major planetary catastrophes and changes in the past and will likely do so again. Whether or not those of us alive today will experience the coming Earth changes is difficult to say. What can be stated with a great degree of certainty is that our solar history is fundamentally different from what we have been taught. And unbeknownst to us, this lie has heavily influenced everything from religion to political institutions to humanity’s collective amnesia. This alone illustrates why those in possession of this information believe it is imperative to keep it obscured. The connections I have made and their implications have immeasurable potential to disrupt the status quo to a degree that cannot yet be defined, but if it were better understood by many others it would likely be politically devastating to the status quo.
All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei